Talk:The Municipal Band of Charlottesville: Difference between revisions

From Cvillepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new sources)
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
:Actually, I read through this and I really enjoy it and think it's written in a way that's not quite "wikipedia" but certainly is written in a style that is engaging and befitting the 250th anniversary. This seems like a story more so than many of our other articles. I added some formatting to break it up a little bit. What do others think? --[[User:Seantubbs|Seantubbs]] 10:23, 10 January 2012 (EST)
:Actually, I read through this and I really enjoy it and think it's written in a way that's not quite "wikipedia" but certainly is written in a style that is engaging and befitting the 250th anniversary. This seems like a story more so than many of our other articles. I added some formatting to break it up a little bit. What do others think? --[[User:Seantubbs|Seantubbs]] 10:23, 10 January 2012 (EST)
::Five years later, I think this article is one of the best on this site.--[[User:Seantubbs|Seantubbs]] ([[User talk:Seantubbs|talk]]) 08:53, 19 January 2017 (CST)
::Five years later, I think this article is one of the best on this site.--[[User:Seantubbs|Seantubbs]] ([[User talk:Seantubbs|talk]]) 08:53, 19 January 2017 (CST)
::Nine years later, I still think this is the best on the site. --[[User:Seantubbs|Seantubbs]] ([[User talk:Seantubbs|talk]]) 09:58, 8 June 2021 (EDT)


==More resources==
==More resources==
[http://search.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/uva-lib:2749529/view#openLayer/uva-lib:2749541/4620.5/2637/2/1/0 January 22, 1937 Daily Progress coverage]
[http://search.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/uva-lib:2749529/view#openLayer/uva-lib:2749541/4620.5/2637/2/1/0 January 22, 1937 Daily Progress coverage]

Latest revision as of 09:58, 8 June 2021

Style

The style of this page needs to be modified more than slightly. It's far too long and contains more detail than necessary. I appreciate the breadth of scope of what's here, and I will work to get in our style. Other editors, please be gentle with modifications as we get Fobryant up to speed on cvillepedia. --Seantubbs 10:23, 10 January 2012 (EST)

Actually, I read through this and I really enjoy it and think it's written in a way that's not quite "wikipedia" but certainly is written in a style that is engaging and befitting the 250th anniversary. This seems like a story more so than many of our other articles. I added some formatting to break it up a little bit. What do others think? --Seantubbs 10:23, 10 January 2012 (EST)
Five years later, I think this article is one of the best on this site.--Seantubbs (talk) 08:53, 19 January 2017 (CST)
Nine years later, I still think this is the best on the site. --Seantubbs (talk) 09:58, 8 June 2021 (EDT)

More resources

January 22, 1937 Daily Progress coverage