Talk:Regional Transit Authority: Difference between revisions

From Cvillepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '==Don't agree with merge== I don't agree that this should be merged with Regional Transportation Authority because that was an idea that evolved during the discussion in 2008…')
 
No edit summary
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Don't agree with merge==
==Don't agree with merge==
I don't agree that this should be merged with [[Regional Transportation Authority]] because that was an idea that evolved during the discussion in 2008 about how the legislation to create the Regional Transit Authority should be written. That bill (HB2158) passed, allowing for a RTA to be formed. The other bill to allow for a sales tax referendum did not pass, and it was during that discussion that the idea of funding other transportation improvements came up, a la the NOVA and HR transportation authorities. More later as I build out this article. --[[User:Seantubbs|Seantubbs]] 15:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't agree that this should be merged with [[Regional Transportation Authority]] because that was an idea that evolved during the discussion in 2008 about how the legislation to create the Regional Transit Authority should be written. That bill (HB2158) passed, allowing for a RTA to be formed. The other bill to allow for a sales tax referendum did not pass, and it was during that discussion that the idea of funding other transportation improvements came up, a la the NOVA and HR transportation authorities. More later as I build out this article. --[[User:Seantubbs|Seantubbs]] 15:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
==Separate page for RTP==
I'm not going to do it yet, but I believe the Regional Transit Partnership should have its own separate page, as it's something that is actually happening as opposed to the RTA, which was never formed. For now I'll make updates on this page, but want to change it when I can. --[[User:Seantubbs|Seantubbs]] ([[User talk:Seantubbs|talk]]) 10:51, 2 June 2019 (EDT)
:I still want to make this a separate page, or find a way to make sure people know that the RTP is a continuation of the amount of time and investment previously placed into this concept. Today, just adding a citation. --[[User:Seantubbs|Seantubbs]] ([[User talk:Seantubbs|talk]]) 13:36, 28 September 2021 (EDT)
==Resources to add==
*[https://www.cvilletomorrow.org/articles/transit-discussions-reopened Page]

Revision as of 13:36, 28 September 2021

Don't agree with merge

I don't agree that this should be merged with Regional Transportation Authority because that was an idea that evolved during the discussion in 2008 about how the legislation to create the Regional Transit Authority should be written. That bill (HB2158) passed, allowing for a RTA to be formed. The other bill to allow for a sales tax referendum did not pass, and it was during that discussion that the idea of funding other transportation improvements came up, a la the NOVA and HR transportation authorities. More later as I build out this article. --Seantubbs 15:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Separate page for RTP

I'm not going to do it yet, but I believe the Regional Transit Partnership should have its own separate page, as it's something that is actually happening as opposed to the RTA, which was never formed. For now I'll make updates on this page, but want to change it when I can. --Seantubbs (talk) 10:51, 2 June 2019 (EDT)

I still want to make this a separate page, or find a way to make sure people know that the RTP is a continuation of the amount of time and investment previously placed into this concept. Today, just adding a citation. --Seantubbs (talk) 13:36, 28 September 2021 (EDT)

Resources to add