Cvillepedia:Article Criteria

From Cvillepedia
Revision as of 13:58, 7 March 2012 by JMarley (talk | contribs) (Created this new page.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The purpose of this Project Page is to have a discussion about what classifies a cvillepedia article as Stub Article, a Good Article, or a Featured Article.

The Cvillepedia:Style guide already covers the mechanics of citations and tone, but we do not yet have our own standards on what qualifies an article as a stub, a good article, or a featured article.

Suggestions:

Stub: Wikipedia loosely defines stub in terms of length.[1] I would suggest that we expand that definition to include:

  • 1 source, or no source at all


Good Article: Once cvillepedia articles meet all of the criteria below, the stub category can be removed.

  • Containing more than 1 source
  • Edited by more than 1 editor
  • Containing at least one internal link


Featured Article: Once cvillpedia articles meet all of the criteria below, they can be featured on the cvillepedia Main Page.

  • Containing more than 1 source
  • Edited by more than 1 editor
  • Containing at least one internal link
  • Containing visual(s) (ex: logo, photo, etc.)

References

  1. Web. Wikipedia:Stub, Registered Wiki users, Wikipedia, retrieved March 7, 2012.